Fifty-sixth in the world, and why the ranking is the least useful number
Serbia sits 56th in the global startup rankings, 14th in Eastern Europe, with 305 million dollars invested since 2017. Here is what those figures do and do not tell you about Belgrade.

Serbia ranks 56th globally in the 2025 StartupBlink rankings, down three places, and 14th in Eastern Europe. Between 2017 and 2025 the country attracted over 305 million dollars in startup investment. Funding jumped 705 percent between 2023 and 2024 while the number of deals fell 31 percent. Belgrade dominates the national ecosystem, followed by Novi Sad and Niš.
Those four sentences contain one genuinely important fact and three that will not change a single decision you make. The important one is the divergence between money and deals: capital rose sharply while the number of companies receiving it shrank. That is not broad growth, it is concentration. A handful of rounds moved the total, and the median company felt none of it.
Concentration matters because it changes what advice is true. In a broad market, the honest advice is to get in front of many investors. In a concentrated one, it is to be the specific kind of company the few active funds are already looking for, or to skip the round and build on revenue. Pretending otherwise wastes a founder's most expensive year.
The rankings themselves I would ignore. A position in the fifties, moving by three places, tells you nothing you can act on and quite a lot about how thin the underlying data is for a market this size. Nobody chose Belgrade because it was 56th and nobody left because it dropped to 59th.
What is actually distinctive here is density. In one city you can walk between the coworking clusters, the meetups, the alliance groups and the two or three organizations that run programs, in a single afternoon. Thirty minutes into a first meetup you will meet five people on exactly your path. That is not something rankings measure and it is the reason things get built here faster than the numbers suggest.
The other movement worth watching is state capital and infrastructure: commitments to AI infrastructure including a supercomputer, participation in European digital programs since 2025, an innovation fund with real money. Public money arrives slowly and with paperwork, and for the right kind of company it is still the cheapest capital available in this market.
So the number I would put on a wall is not 56 and not 305 million. It is the count of companies here that reached a first paying customer outside the region this year. That is the metric that eventually moves everything else, and it is the one nobody publishes.
If you are building in Belgrade and want a straight conversation about which of these numbers should affect your plan, write to me.
Reply
If any of this is wrong, or right in a way you can add to, I would rather hear it. Write to antanaskoviczarko@gmail.com or find me on LinkedIn.
Related reading