← All writingHome
Startups & VCNumbers15 September 2026 · 6 min read

Seventy-two percent want to raise, and hiring plans keep missing

The Startup Scanner surveyed 170 startups in Serbia. More of them plan to raise than ever, and for the third year in a row they hired fewer people than they said they would.

The Digital Serbia Initiative's Startup Scanner 2026 surveyed 170 startups across Serbia. Two findings sit uncomfortably next to each other. More than 72 percent plan to raise external investment in 2026, and one in four is targeting a round above 1.1 million dollars, roughly three times the ambition of earlier editions. At the same time, hiring outcomes have fallen short of stated hiring plans in each of the last three years, and the share of startups older than three years still below one million euro in annual revenue rose sharply.

Read together, that is an ecosystem that has reoriented toward capital faster than it has reoriented toward customers. Raising is a plan you can make alone. Revenue is a plan that requires someone else to agree with you.

I am not against raising. I have watched rounds unlock things that no amount of discipline would have. But a fundraising target is a consequence of a business, not a substitute for one, and the gap between planned hiring and actual hiring tells you where the pressure really is. Teams plan to hire because a plan needs headcount. They do not hire because the revenue that would pay for it did not show up.

The pattern I see in program applications matches the survey. A founder arrives with a deck built for investors and no written answer to three questions: who paid you last month, what did they do before you existed, and what is the smallest thing you could sell next week. Fixing that order is most of what a good accelerator does, and it is not a fundraising workshop.

There is a second uncomfortable finding in these reports: a large number of founders still treat their startup as a secondary professional commitment. That is rational in a market where a senior engineering salary is stable and good, and it also explains a lot of the revenue plateau. A company run in evenings does not lose to a better company, it loses to the calendar.

So what would I do with these numbers if I were building here in 2026. First, set a revenue target before a funding target and write both on the same page. Second, treat hiring as the last resort rather than the first milestone, because tooling now covers a surprising amount of what used to require a second and third hire. Third, if you are part time, pick a date to stop being part time or pick a smaller ambition, because the middle position costs the most and returns the least.

The good news in the same data is real. Pre-seed activity has doubled, more first-year companies are getting funded than before, and second-time founders are starting from a much higher floor. That is what an ecosystem looks like when it starts to compound. It just compounds around companies with customers.

If you are somewhere in that 72 percent and want an honest read on whether you are ready to raise, send me what you have.

Share this post

Anyone can repost this on LinkedIn or X, or copy the direct link: https://zarkoantanaskovic.com/blog/seventy-two-percent-want-to-raise

Reply

If any of this is wrong, or right in a way you can add to, I would rather hear it. Write to collab@zarkoantanaskovic.com or find me on LinkedIn.

Newsletter

Get new resources by email

One email a month: new skills, prompts and notes on community programs. Unsubscribe anytime.

More writing

Numbers

Serbian startup funding in 2026: more money, thinner middle

Serbian startups raised $43.9M in 2025. Pre-seed doubled, seed halved. Here is where early-stage money in Serbia actually comes from, with sources.

AI adoption

I'm now a Claude Community Ambassador

What it means, why I said yes, and what I'll be doing with it in Belgrade and online: hands-on sessions, real demos, and practical Claude workflows.

Building without code

4 free Lovable skills I use every week

Event pages, promo visuals, an ecosystem CRM and a 5-day founder playbook. The files I actually use, written down so your Lovable agent starts with the same context.

Ecosystem data

Serbia drops to 58th: the StartupBlink 2026 numbers and the conversion gap

Third decline in a row, Belgrade out of the global top 200, and neighbours growing four times faster. The conditions are there. The startups are not following at the same pace.

AI adoption

Claude as a co-founder: what it replaces and what it doesn't

I talked about this in front of 100 people in Belgrade and then had to keep doing it every day. Here is the honest version: what an AI partner replaces, what it does not, and where it quietly makes you worse.

Building without code

Five days, not five months: the real cost of building with Lovable

I have shipped several small products this way as a non-technical person. The build stopped being the expensive part, and something else took its place.

AI adoption

AI inside an accelerator: where it helped and where it hurt

I co-created an accelerator and run a monthly meetup and a community of 1,100+ people. AI changed parts of that work and quietly damaged others. Both lists are short and specific.

Numbers

4.55 billion euro of exports, and the part that is not ours

Serbia exported 4.55 billion euro of ICT services in 2025. It is a real number and it hides the thing that actually matters for founders here.

Numbers

Fifty-sixth in the world, and why the ranking is the least useful number

Serbia sat 56th in 2025 in the global startup rankings, 14th in Eastern Europe, with 305 million dollars invested since 2017. Here is what those figures do and do not tell you about Belgrade.

Building without code

I am now a Lovable Certified Partner

What the certification actually means, why I went through it as a non-technical person, and how it changes the way I build products with founders and organizations here.

Serbian ecosystem

One in three Serbian startups made no revenue at all

The 2026 Startup Scanner numbers are blunt: a third of startups here earned nothing last year, another third earned up to 50,000 euro, and a quarter are planning to raise over a million.

AI adoption

The MIT 95 percent number, read closely

MIT's NANDA researchers found that 95 percent of enterprise generative AI pilots produce no measurable return. Read closely, that is not a verdict on the technology.

AI adoption

The gap is not the technology, it is the readiness

What I keep seeing between what frontier tools can already do and what organizations here are set up to absorb, and what actually closes that gap.

Regional ecosystem

398 million euro, 109 deals, and what that means from Belgrade

Southeast Europe attracted 398.3 million euro of venture capital across 109 transactions in 2025, up nearly 40 percent. Here is what that scale actually implies for founders here.

Regional cybersecurity

Nineteen startups in eleven countries

The mapping of early-stage cybersecurity startups across Southeast Europe, and why only two confirmed active product startups sit in Serbia.

Building without code

Non-technical, on purpose

Notes from shipping small products with AI tooling: what these tools genuinely do, where they stop, and why I would rather find out from the inside.